I was annoyed that my cable supplier didn’t (and doesn’t) give me access to Sky Atlantic. The silver lining, though, is that some pretty tough decisions have been taken for me, and it’s not as if I don’t have more than enough to watch anyway. For example, if I had it I’d probably have watched Boardwalk Empire and Treme; as it was I found the time to watch The Killing. Anyway, here we are again: on Sky Atlantic on Friday at 10.15pm, In Treatment starts a belated first UK run for season 2. Season 1 was absolutely top-notch stuff, and I’ve no reason to think season 2 will be any different, with Hope Davis, John Mahoney, and Alison Pill queueing up to get the benefit of Gabriel Byrne’s advice, and Dianne Wiest reprising her role as the therapist’s therapist. But I won’t be watching, which might give me a chance to check out one or two of the new British shows starting next week, of which more in a day or two.
And so season 1 comes to an end. In one way I’m kind of relieved. As I’ve said more than once ‘In Treatment’ requires a massive investment from the viewer, and not just the time involved in watching five episodes a week; it’s challenging, emotional, thought-provoking drama.
The best episode of this final week was the first, which also had a genuine claim to be the best of the whole season. Inevitably it involved the spellbinding Mia Wasikowska as Sophie, this time able to confront her absentee father, played to perfection by ‘Thirtysomething’ alumnus Peter Horton. (Incidentally, many ‘In Treatment’ episodes were directed by Melanie Mayron, also ex-‘Thirtysomething’. This sort of thing feeds my TV geek fantasy that the stars of ensemble TV drama and comedy also hang out in real life.) Horton’s thankless task was to animate a major, but hitherto unseen, ‘In Treatment’ hate figure and for the first half of the episode he was as creepy and manipulative as might have been hoped. He then turned it round quite stunningly in the second half, showing the pain caused by a broken family, while never quite letting go of the idea that he still, very probably, got off lightly. And Gabriel Byrne’s measured performance as Paul completed a mesmerising episode.
After that, the home straight consisted of a few loose ends which needed to be tied up. While both Josh Charles and Embeth Davidtz once more turned in excellent performances as Jake and Amy, to this viewer at least their marriage seemed quite doomed from the start, leading to puzzlement as to why Paul would expend so much emotional energy trying to save it. Jake, at least, became more complex as the series went on, particularly in the episodes in which he was on his own with Paul.
And then Paul turned up on Laura’s doorstep, in passing giving us a great wave of irritation as he told Kate who he was going to see, and Kate pulled a long-suffering face, as if to be all, “Do you see what I have to put up with?” You, Kate, had the affair. You fucked off TO ROME with your lover. Drop dead. (Which Paul very nearly did anyway, but I’ll let the episode speak for itself.)
And in conclusion? Despite the intensity of the schedule I wouldn’t have missed a second, never mind an episode. ‘In Treatment’ offered yet further evidence that TV drama has every right to be considered as a major art form, with top-drawer acting, scripting and direction, and an appreciation that viewers are able to bring their own experiences to a show, shape it, and form their own conclusions. I don’t know if seasons 2 or 3 will be shown in the UK , but I’ll be there if they are.
Another emotionally draining week on ‘In Treatment’, as the season nears its conclusion. The portentous phone call taken by Paul at the end of last week’s episodes turns out to have been about the death of Alex. (And although Blair Underwood doesn’t appear in this week’s episodes I think it again fair to note that the big issue surrounding his death – suicide or not? – remain open in large measure because of his acting.) The first episode of this week deals with the funeral, at which Paul, somewhat edgily, encounters Laura – once again, a much more plausible love interest outside of the therapy context. The second episode sees Paul visited by Alex’s grieving father, (a quite breathtaking – and Emmy winning – performance by Glynn Turman, formerly of ‘The Wire’.)
On top of that, the Sophie episode was perhaps the most harrowing to date, as she reaches some sort of breakthrough in her therapy. Perhaps just as well: I’m sure therapists can’t be evaluated on a success/failure basis, but apart from Sophie – who has herself attempted suicide, so it’s hardly unalloyed triumph – it’s not been a great year for Paul. Gabriel Byrne and Mia Wasikowska continue to do terrific work together, and Sophie reaching out to her mother at the end was astonishingly moving.
Up against the stiffest of competition the Jake/Amy episode – this week featuring only Jake – was again something of a makeweight, although Josh Charles was on top form as we found out a number of surprising things about Jake. And after that pause for breath, there was more high-wire acting from Byrne and Dianne Wiest as the Paul/Gina episode started slowly but built to a remarkable and confrontational climax. ‘In Treatment’ requires a high level of commitment from viewers, but we’re being richly rewarded.
With Laura temporarily not featuring, the first episode of the week instead gave us Paul and his children. It was typically well-crafted, but did little apart from add a little of Paul’s backstory. This might have been the first time all season that ‘In Treatment’ has been a little dull.
Everyone else, however, was on top form. Sorry to keep going on about this, but I just don’t buy the resumption of the therapist/patient relationship between Paul and Alex as remotely plausible. I’m prepared to live with it, though, as it gave Blair Underwood the opportunity to turn in his best performance yet, even better than last time: apparently revealing a lot, but leaving the big questions opaque. I still couldn’t say for sure whether he’s gay, whether he wants to go back on active duty, whether he’s traumatised. Mia Wasikowska’s excellence as Sophie is now so routine that we’re in danger of losing sight of just how good she is. And Paul and Kate’s own session with Gina was as compelling as ever: after a week of seeing Paul preside loftily over the petty behaviour of others, it’s salutary to watch him sniping petulantly at his wife, even if she does kind of deserve it. Strike that “kind of”, on reflection.
But the most powerful episode of the week – and the real revelation – was the Josh and Amy episode. After weeks of this being the weak link, we got the payoff this time round. I mean, I’m now firmly on Team Josh, but as the two of them ripped each others’ souls out it was harrowing stuff.
A very intense week on ‘In Treatment’ started off with Laura, no longer a patient, turning to Paul for solace while her father is in hospital and Paul, in turn, confessing his feelings to her. Perhaps it’s because the therapist/patient relationship is over, perhaps not, but this was the first time I’ve been able to see why someone might love Laura. (Lust, not a problem.) And now that Paul’s feelings are out in the open, he is obliged to sit there during his joint session with Kate while she builds up quite the remarkable self-righteous head of steam. As I’ve said before I like Michelle Forbes as an actor, but she’s taken on a hell of a challenge here: a character both unlikeable and unfaithful. “You think you deserve her, you’ve earned her, because of what I did to you?” she demands of Paul earlier in the week. To which the obvious answer is: yep, he does and he has. Incidentally, it struck me that Gina’s clinical dissection of their marriage is the best example we’ve seen all season of a therapist actually dishing out the therapy.
Laura’s far from the only one with father issues this week. (Mind you, as Philip Larkin (and Sylvia Plath) identified a while ago, who doesn’t have father issues? And it can’t be coincidence that all of these patients are drawn to the distinctly paternal Paul.) Alex certainly does, and in this week’s other highlight he and Paul also confront the big, well-dressed, showtune-loving elephant in the therapy room: is Alex gay? While it might seem less than plausible that their relationship is re-established after the provocation and physical violence of their last encounter, this was undoubtedly Blair Underwood’s finest week so far.
Next to those three episodes, for the first time the Sophie storyline didn’t quite work for me: father issues, eating disorders, whatever: I felt as if we were treading water a bit, and although Mia Wasikowska was as good as ever Sophie was stripped of some of her nuances this time round and came off as petulant and unpleasant. More father and food issues with Amy as well in the next episode of the least compelling storyline; I’m still not really caring about her clearly misguided and doomed marriage to Josh.
That aside, though, the end of the season is approaching, and the writers have at least five conclusions to fashion. On the evidence so far, they’ve got the pacing pretty much right.
Five excellent episodes this week; even the makeweight Jake and Amy storyline provided enjoyment as Paul decided that an aggressive approach might pay dividends. Or maybe he just felt like it. After all, he was having a hell of a week.
The series is still pivoting on the relationship between Paul and Laura, examined again in the first of this week’s episodes. While we now know that Paul claims that he loves Laura, we still don’t know why, nor whether it’s because the producers are leaving it to the intuition of the viewer to fill in the gaps, or – and it matters – because they’ve undercooked the writing and acting.
Anyway, Alex senses a weakness and homes in on it during his session, in what was perhaps the most extraordinary episode so far; and after ruthless and relentless probing – and a remarkable violation of privacy – Paul finally snaps. This gets further explored during Paul’s own session with Gina, for which they are joined by Kate, ostensibly trying to save their marriage, although partly at least trying to reclaim a bit of the moral high ground. Personally, though, I’m not sure that she deserves too much sympathy just because her dirty weekend in Rome didn’t go according to plan.
Somewhat sui generis in all of this is Sophie’s story, which this week provided raw, uncomfortable, but compelling viewing. I’ve said it already, but justice demands that – yet again – Mia Wasikowska’s remarkable performance be acknowledged. She’s switching from girlhood to womanhood and back again in a manner which feels both utterly traumatic and completely natural.
Defences are beginning to break down. Laura is very evidently trying to make Paul jealous with her pursuit of Alex. It’s a high-risk strategy, not least because there’s some evidence that Alex might well want to bat for the other side. Nonetheless it works: firstly provoking an unusually combative and acrimonious session between Paul and Alex, and then pushing Paul, later in the week, into an admission of how he feels about Laura.
Sophie continues to straddle childhood and adulthood in a way which pushes her to another suicide attempt, this time more or less in front of Paul just after he’s managed to get her to concede the truth about her first one. And back to being the weak link this time is the episode featuring Jake and Amy. There aren’t many wholly likeable characters in ‘In Treatment’, but Jake and Amy are so intensely unlikeable that it’s hard to dredge up any sympathy for them.
Standout acting performance this week, though, is Gabriel Byrne’s in Paul’s own session with guru/therapist/friend Gina. Paul requires to be reactive for most of the week, but with Gina he gets to set the pace; this week he’s got a lot to get out in the open, although one imagines there are still a few things about their shared past we’ve yet to discover for ourselves. Dianne Wiest matches Byrne every step of the way. ‘In Treatment’ continues to be sombre, thoughtful drama – TV for grown-ups.