The Good Wife s7 ep 3

Another interesting case from the bond court, in ‘Cooked’: Alicia is instructed by Roland Hlavin, a young scientist who has been making a designer drug which isn’t GHB, but which has the same effect. Lucca acts for Hlavin’s dealer, and the two of them are offered an “exploding plea” – the first to plead gets one year in prison, the other gets 25 years, an hour to accept, clock’s ticking – by this week’s ASA. (Who just gets referred to by his title, rather than his first name, by Judge Schakowsky, because he isn’t Matan.)

Alicia’s first defence is that the faux-GHB isn’t a controlled drug, although that doesn’t get far. Then another possible defence is raised by Lucca, which depends on Hlavin instructing Alicia in a precise way; not for the first time, Alicia skirts ethical propriety in obtaining the instructions she wants, on this occasion by sketching out a hypothetical scenario to Hlavin. “Is that”, Eli asks after the fact, “a lawyerly way of saying you helped him lie?” The question of the extent to which Alicia was indeed helping her client to lie becomes a live one because Hlavin isn’t all he seems, and nor is his crime.

To say any more would be spoilery, so I won’t: but, like last week, it’s a reminder that even as the finishing line approaches for The Good Wife, it remains one of the very best shows on TV. In particular, the way in which a complex legal issue is elucidated is a model of the form. And the final twist is a wicked one; with, in all likelihood, lingering consequences.

The subplots work better this week as well, even if I’m still not convinced about the political arc. It’s undoubtedly entertaining to have Alicia and Veronica play passive-aggressive happy families on ‘Mama’s Homespun Cooking’, a reality TV show on which mothers pass on hard-won wisdom and cooking tips to their daughters, particularly as Veronica is on spectacular form: “I had a little wine at lunch, but I haven’t been drinking”. I have a feeling, though, that The Revenge of Eli is going to get very old very quickly. I ask again: why doesn’t Ruth just get him fired if all he’s going to do is undermine the campaign?

And I was about to award the Lockhart, Agos and Lee plot full marks this week, until it pulled the rug out from under me. To start with, Howard Lyman consults Alicia, because he’s being undermined. “My guess”, Alicia explains tartly, “ is that they’re pushing you out because of performance. You don’t do anything, Howard”. He takes the hint and, after a chance encounter with Jackie, also starts a romance with her. There might be life in Lyman yet.

Then Diane has a deeply unsatisfactory encounter with one of her new interns, who she’s offering to mentor; it’s a delicious scene, no more than a minute or so long, in which New Intern is all, but I don’t want to work more hours, and what about my new boyfriend? New Intern has a point, but it’s not the sort of point that Diane wants to hear, schooled as she was in an era when young attorneys worked 24/7, sacrificed their personal lives, and gratefully accepted the patronage of more experienced colleagues.

All of which makes her feel more generous towards Alicia, and her firm agrees to start giving Alicia some of their overspill cases. Good, I thought; we need Diane and Alicia as allies rather than adversaries. But then the show uses an overheard phone conversation to… well, I thought it was a bit of a cheap trick, particularly as the relationship between Alicia and her former partners foundered in the first place because of misunderstandings and split-second coincidences. Enough. Putting that aside, though, this was excellent.


4 thoughts on “The Good Wife s7 ep 3

  1. CJ Cregg February 14, 2016 / 11:45 pm

    Hm. I really enjoyed this, and the sting business was brilliant, but I’m not at all convinced they got the law right. I’m no expert in Illinois drug laws but it doesn’t make any sense to say trying to make GHB with a view to selling it (crime 1) and ending up making an analogue (crime 2) instead which you then actually do try to sell as GHB (crime 3) means you’re not guilty of anything at all. Any experts out there who can confirm the position?

    Broadly agree with you on the rest of it, though, Jed. Great fun on the whole and the ageism stuff was hilarious – the”Someone had a good nap” scene was a joy – but I too was really disappointed Diane and Alicia fell out again over this kind of misunderstanding. I don’t even understand why they they were at odds at the start of the season – I thought they’d made up after they fell out last year – but I was so pleased they were making up and now they’re enemies again and I’m gutted. Their relationship is terrific – remember that hug during The Last Call? – and it is a crime to waste all those years of work building that bond on this type of contrivance. Was taking Will away from us NOT ENOUGH?

  2. CJ Cregg February 14, 2016 / 11:50 pm

    PS – The New Intern scene was terrific but New Intern herself was an idiot. If DIANE LOCKHART offered to mentor me, I would take every minute she could spare without a second thought. The woman is practically royalty.

  3. Jed Bartlet February 15, 2016 / 12:41 pm

    No idea whether it’s an accurate statement of the actual law in Illinois. But within the show’s internal logic I thought it worked OK: if the offence requires intent to manufacture an analogue, and the intent isn’t there, the offence isn’t complete.

    I agree about New Intern being an idiot – in fact, I was just a tiny bit troubled by the writers making NI blonde, female, young, and hair-flicky. Interesting contrast, though between Diane’s old-school values and NI’s millennial ones. On one view, as I said, NI had a couple of good points – why shouldn’t she want a work-life balance? But the writers put a thumb on the scales by making her blonde, female, etc.

  4. Snoskred February 16, 2016 / 6:13 am

    I’ve been watching a new show called Billions, with everyones favourite redhead, Damien Lewis. The show is excellent, and you can feel that the entire cast is just having the most fun ever. which is a huge contrast to TGW, now. Where it sort of feels like the entire cast wants out, stat!

    There is something else which I wanted to mention to CJ.. there is a guy in this show who reminds me a little of Will/Josh Charles. His name is Toby Leonard Moore.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.