Scandal s5 ep 4

As I feared, last week’s episode was indeed preparing the way for the return of the B-613 plot. Kind of, anyway: Jake visits Rowan in prison, and tries to get him to admit that he’s behind the fire at the Louvre as part of Lazarus One – the B-613 plan for putting itself back together in the event of catastrophe. (The plan itself – steal some artworks, replace them with fire-damaged copies, and sell the originals to secretive oligarchs – is a little prosaic for the once-mighty B-613. Never mind.) Rowan denies all knowledge, of course, but Jake and Charlie head to “Paris” – a few shots of the Eiffel Tower – to meet Elise, an old art-market-connected contact of Charlie’s.

Well, as soon as Jake and Elise set eyes on each other they realise that they know each other. Heck, used to work together. Actually, used to date. In fact, were married. Or is “were” the mot juste? Given the backstory – she didn’t turn up at Grand Central to meet him, because nothing is forever in spy world; he thought she was dead and decided instead to romance the President’s mistress – presumably they never in fact got a divorce, so are still married? It’s not impossible that I’m overthinking this. Anyway, on the face of it the art heist has nothing to do with B-613, but Elise gets shot in the course of establishing that. Not fatally, so Jake invites her back to the States, and since they’ve already made out, and since Elise is played by Mia Maestro, and since the whole thing has Rowan’s fingerprints all over it, I’m guessing we have (a) a new recurring character who’s (b) more than she seems.

In fact, I think we have two new recurring characters. Because back in Washington, D.C., those of us who were wondering what OPA was actually up to these days get an answer of sorts: not surprisingly, since they never seem to do any actual work, they’re haemorrhaging clients and the business is in the crapper. So Quinn sets up a meeting in a bar with Marcus, the activist we saw last season, in order to offer him a job. She gives him a version of the gladiators-in-suits speech she got from Harrison way back in the pilot, and although Marcus at this point refuses the offer, he does so in a way which mimics the cadences of a typical Shondaland character, so we know it’s just a matter of time before he comes aboard.

And when he does, he makes a series of pertinent observations about race and gender which, I would guess, were at least in part inspired by Alessandra Stanley’s infamous article in the New York Times about “angry black woman” Shonda Rhimes. The media is reporting the affair between Fitz and Olivia, Marcus concludes, in a way which they simply wouldn’t do were the female protagonist white: it’s dog-whistle politics. So it’s time to fight back, and change the topic to the reporting of the scandal; and Marcus, Quinn, and – amazingly – Huck do the rounds of the political TV shows to achieve that. I’m not sure that Huck is the public advocate I’d want if my future were on the line, but on the basis of what we see he just about gets away with it.

Back in “the Oval”, as everyone is still calling it, Fitz wants to fire Abby for throwing Olivia under the bus last week. That would suit me fine, as presumably she’d head back to OPA, and we could get closer to reuniting season 2’s dream team, but it doesn’t happen. While he’s stamping his foot like a toddler, though, everyone else is discussing whether to impeach him: gender politics here, too, as an all-female senators’ caucus tries to persuade Mellie to join them. She wavers, particularly after a visit to see Fitz – which actually reminded me of the existence of Teddy, their son – during which they agree an informal non-aggression pact.

On the other hand, Cyrus is leaping up and down demanding that she join the impeachment movement, although his logic seems a little flawed: if Fitz leaves the Oval, he’ll be replaced by Susan Ross, who will be a disaster, whereupon the country will look for someone with gravitas, i.e. Mellie. Gravitas? Mellie? I don’t think so. But Cyrus is largely motivated by revenge and betrayal: he loved Fitz, you see, in a way that Mellie just didn’t. He then spectacularly overplays his hand, though, when he makes a jaw-droppingly tasteless comparison between Fitz (who he regards as his son) and Mellie’s dead son; at least she knows her son’s safe in the ground. It’s as good as a resignation speech. He’s lucky she didn’t stab him, frankly.

An episode which is wrapped in a framing device – a TV documentary about Olivia Pope – ends, appropriately, with Fitz and Olivia heading straight into the eye of the media storm, when he goes round to her apartment in order to take her out for dinner. Once again, this can be seen as a direct reaction to the not-very-coded criticism offered to Fitz by a Republican senator, who suggests that the President should have a lover more acceptable to the party’s base. Eff that, Fitz clearly thinks; she’s the woman I love. Which is as close to admirable as anything he’s done in a while, even if it does lead to Mellie joining the impeachment cause. A highly enjoyable episode, and one with something to say.


3 thoughts on “Scandal s5 ep 4

  1. CPS December 31, 2015 / 8:00 pm

    This was a very good episode which would have been great without the reappearance of B613 in the form of Lazarus. The focus should have been on only Olivia, OPA and the White House.

    Actually the toddler in this episode was Mellie who once again acted impulsively to join the impeachment gang. She forgot that any mud flung on Fitz will splatter on her too. They have all committed so many crimes that Mellie should not want Congress investigating the Grant administration.

    Fitz should have fired Abby for taking action again without clearance from the President. She is the White House press secretary but she acts as if she works for Olivia still or whomever fills her ear with their view (previously she was following Cyrus’ instruction by saying the Grant marriage was intact when Fitz had kicked out Mellie).

    I was pleased that Fitz stood up to that sexist racist Senator Gibson and gave him the f*ck you by going public with Olivia. You may have noticed that all of the legislation (Brandon Bill, gun control, immigration reform, etc.) that Gibson and his goons wanted to roll back which Fitz got passed would have hurt mainly minorities but the senators took equal pay act off the table because that primarily helps their (white) wives.

  2. Jed Bartlet January 1, 2016 / 4:43 pm

    I must admit I didn’t notice that about the legislation, CPS – good point. That was one dog-whistle which clearly eluded me.

    Interesting in general that a show which hardly mentioned race at all in its first season, even with an African-American woman as its lead, has now moved the topic front and centre. I suppose that might reflect what’s happening in American politics, but as someone who lives outside that country it would perhaps be presumptuous of me to say that with any certainty.

    I even found the B-613 bits tolerable in this episode. Actually, as long as it’s not driving the show I don’t mind it cropping up every now and again.

    • CPS January 1, 2016 / 5:35 pm

      Yes, the show is reflecting the political climate in the US but it is also reflective of how people of color (POC) and women are discussed in the media worldwide. There is a lot of coded language used in general.

      I hate that the B613 story line and characters waste air time that could be used to show more of the other supporting characters – OPA team, Abby, Cyrus, Susan Ross, etc. Then we always get a lame payoff with the never-ending B613 arc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s