Lost s6 ep 1; s6 ep 2

At this stage in the game, it’s probably fair to say that no-one else in TV history has become as practised at the ‘WTF?’ storytelling genre as ‘Lost’ showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse.  And you can add to that, in my view, an absolute conviction that, yes, they do know what they’re doing and where they’re going.

So when faced with a masterful piece of television like, particularly, the first of these episodes, all you really need to do is sit back and enjoy.  As I said at the start of season 5, every single episode of ‘Lost’ is an event, in a way that no other show presently on TV can match, and the writers know it. Not only that, but their mastery of the whole process of producing the 21st century’s most speculated-about show has become absolute – Darlton have, somehow, managed to leak-proof the ‘Lost’ set, and neutralise speculation about which actors might or might not come back.  Thus there’s still genuine and pleasant surprise when old characters crop up again – yes, there he is, and him, and her.  Even Dominic Monaghan has popped in, taking a break from whatever it is he’s doing in ‘FlashForward’ (and I must confess that, without going back and looking, I’ve kind of forgotten, which doesn’t bode well).

And, in fact, episodes 1 and 2 were relatively uncomplicated pieces of work.  By ‘Lost’ standards, that is.  It looked like a straightforward telling of the post-Boom story along parallel lines: this is what happens back on the island if Jack’s plan doesn’t work, and this is what happens on Oceanic Air flight 316 if it does.  So on the island it’s all about the usual ‘Lost’ stuff: hatches, torches, running about, Others and so on.  The familiarity might have jarred had this been a few episodes in, but at the start of a season it all feels fresh again, and it’s good to have them back anyway.  I’m not sure that introducing yet another gang of island natives is altogether helpful at this stage, but we’ll see where that goes. 

Off the island, though, the action was at least as intriguing.  We’ve invested so much effort in following the Losties through time and jungle that we’ve kind of lost sight of why they were all travelling from Australia to LA in the first place, and it was oddly moving so see flight 316 actually touching down safely after all.  Thereafter everything’s as it was before the start of episode 1: Jack’s trying to get his dead father home; Locke’s in a wheelchair; Kate’s a criminal.  How do these stories play out?  (And what’s Desmond doing on the plane, brother?  Just how much history has been rewritten?)  Looks like we’re going to get a chance to see.

But back on the island, it’s pretty much Locke as Satan, I think.  There’s what looks like some pretty explicit religious imagery of baptism and rebirth as well.  One of the strengths of Michael Emerson’s performance has always been the delicious ambiguity he’s brought to the role of Ben, and it’s kind of looking again as if he and Jacob might, after all, be on the side of the good guys.  If, that is, the world of ‘Lost’ can be reduced to concepts such as “good” and “evil”; something tells me that it’s not going to be that easy.  If I had to hazard a guess about where this season is going, I’d speculate that the two storylines will converge at some point thus making some point about destiny, but, hell, I don’t know.  And I like not knowing.  Whatever happens, though, I hereby promise not to complain about the ending: as these episodes proved yet again, ‘Lost’ has always been about so much more than the Answer that occasional viewers think they’re entitled to.  Welcome back, guys.

8 thoughts on “Lost s6 ep 1; s6 ep 2

  1. Red February 6, 2010 / 1:25 pm

    What I also noticed was that Shannon *wasn’t* on the plane, so history has clearly changed a bit. I was kind of disappointed at the start, when it looked like everything had worked out nicely, so was really glad when he cut to Kate hanging in the tree. It almost looked as if there was no air, and I wondered for a minute if she was under the sea. I’ll only complain about the ending if it finishes with somone saying “No one expects the Spanish Inquisition.” (That was a Sliding Doors reference, in case you missed it.)

  2. CJ Cregg February 6, 2010 / 1:55 pm

    Lost is always a rush, and I had a blast watching these two eps for the most part. It *is* good to have them back. But, to be honest, there were a lot of things I was really disappointed in.

    If you haven’t seen eps 1 and 2 yet – don’t read on, there be SPOILERS.

    Juliet being “alive!” then “oops, dead again” was utterly weak, and massively diluted the power of her initial fall and tearful letting go of Sawyer’s hand (which had been genuinely moving for me, even though I’ve never warmed to her as a character). Sayid’s resurrection was so obvious (how much shiftier could Miles’ staring have been?) as to be comical. And I may be in the decided minority who usually likes Jack, but they made his island self utterly pathetic. Yes Juliet’s death is tragic, but let’s cut him some slack, he didn’t push her in the hole, and the plan obviously did *something* seeing as they’re not in the 1970’s any more.

    And, after the initial sweetness of seeing everybody, one by one, on the plane and seeing them land safely, I was actually completely uninterested in the prospect of watching their off-island lives. Juliet maybe suggesting coffee with somebody? Meh. Jin and Sun back to their daddy/marital issues? Kate on the run yet again? PLEASE NO.

    As for the temple folk? Bah. I thought they were naff. (And what on earth is the writers’ fascination with Cindy all about?!?)

    However, I loved everything about Locke in both his Locke and Evil!Locke incarnations, all his scenes were awesome and Terry O’Quinn knocked it right out of the park. The scene with him and Jack in the airport was lovely too. Hurley was fantastic. I’m still super-excited about it all – I do love Lost.

  3. Red February 6, 2010 / 2:27 pm

    Yeah, it was rubbish when you thought Juliet had survived and then she didn’t…

  4. CJ Cregg February 6, 2010 / 2:34 pm

    Can’t believe I forgot to mention it in my mammoth comment, but Hurley telling Sayid’s “dead” body that “If you want to talk, I’ll be around” was possibly the highlight of the night. Hilarious.

  5. Red February 6, 2010 / 2:41 pm

    Oh, i loved that bit too!

  6. Jed Bartlet February 6, 2010 / 8:54 pm

    But we knew Juliet was alive at the point when she detonated the bomb (i.e. after the hand-letting-go).

    • CJ Cregg February 6, 2010 / 9:46 pm

      Yeah, but none of them knew that. She should just have “stayed” dead after the bomb exploded and the hole and everything fell in on her. Bringing her back alive just to kill her again in a super-cheesy second goodbye scene was just daft, I thought. I’d already seen Sawyer say goodbye to her once, and the first time was pretty powerful. The second was too corny.

  7. Jed Bartlet February 6, 2010 / 9:04 pm

    Agree about Terry O’Quinn, though. Terrific performance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.